Surely then I would want to use some form of document view, then, in order to get back the original document I put in?
Frédéric Esnault wrote: > > Yes the system view is very different from the document view, which is > more "business" and/or "human readable". The system view shows your node > information in a system point of view, which means in a jackrabbit > architecture view. > > The information you expect to see (ie node name, property values) are > mixed in a huge amount of system information about the node, its type, its > mixins, its system properties (mandatory, multivalued....) > > It may be quite funky, as you say. > > Frédéric Esnault - Ingénieur R&D > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : woolly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : mercredi 13 juin 2007 10:36 > À : [email protected] > Objet : RE: Importing and Exporting XML > > > > Frédéric Esnault wrote: >> >> I confirm, the document view is not recommended for two reasons : >> - some metadata are added during import (at least jcr:primaryType, see >> spec. 7.3.2.1); >> - multivalued properties are not exported ! >> >> Use system view... ;) >> > > When I try this: > session.exportSystemView(node.getPath(), out, true, false); > > ...things get REALLY funky. It starts to look like this: > > <sv:property sv:name="jcr:primaryType" sv:type="Name"> > <sv:value>nt:unstructured</sv:value> > </sv:property> > ..... > > And looks nothing like my original document. What am I doing wrong? > > Thanks for your comments. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Importing-and-Exporting-XML-tf3908819.html#a11095075 > Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Importing-and-Exporting-XML-tf3908819.html#a11095378 Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
