On 7/10/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

....I guess we need to make a difference between meaningful paths in the
sense of "locally unique and readable" and the sense of "semantically
valid" where someone would want to use the name itself as a specific
attribute like name or email address. I much prefer treating names in
the former sense....

Ok, I see your point, thanks for clarifying!

IIUC this means that "/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/stuff" would stay as is, even if
mark changes his email later on - in fact this is the exact same
problem as a blog post stored under 2007/some_title, where the title
changes later but the path shouldn't.

-Bertrand

Reply via email to