Julian Reschke wrote:

again you're proposing a major change to JCR.
Sorry for my ignorance, but it is funny, you just dropped XPath and you saying that fixing of an obvious mistake is a major change ?

If a query would need to take transient changes into account, it needs to operate both on the persisted state, and on the local transient space. Note that these may be on different machines. Maybe it's just me, but I have no idea how that could be implemented efficiently, *in particular* if you don't have the luxury to develop that functionality from scratch.
I am sorry, but an implementation of that is a trivial task, everybody does it.
Have a look at any persistence engines.

--
Ivan Latysh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to