On 7/20/07, Alexandru Popescu ☀ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/20/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/20/07, Stefan Guggisberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > AFAIK databases simply don't support the concept of transient changes.
> > please note that the JCR save() is not the equivalent of a db commit().
>
> Well said! A better analogue, as already mentoned, is Statement.execute().
>
Hope you will not get angry on me :-), but an uncommitted change is a
transient change, so I do think RDBMS are using the transient concept.
hehe, i won't ;) but i don't agree. IMO an INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE on
database is the equivalent of a saved transient change in JCR.
uncommitted (but saved) changes in JCR are the equivalent of uncommitted
db changes. at least that's how i view it.
cheers
stefan
bests,
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
