Folks, I'm interested in getting feedback on this simple atompub Node Type Definition. My intention was to keep things simple but wonder if this is too simple. Are there any beginners mistakes being made?
BTW, I've found Jackrabbit and JSR 170 in general to be very easy to work with and I appreciate your efforts. IMO, JSR 170 Looks like Oracle is supporting the JSR [1] now. Interesting days. [1] http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/oracle11g/pdf/xml-db-11g-whitepaper.pdf ATOMPUB NODE TYPE ================================================= <atom = "http://www.w3.org/2007/atom";> <app = "http://www.w3.org/2007/app";> <ism = "http://ism.cisco.com/2007/ism/1.0";> <nt = "http://www.jcp.org/jcr/nt/1.0";> <mix = "http://www.jcp.org/jcr/mix/1.0";> [atom:Base] >nt:base - atom:lang (string) [atom:Person] > atom:Base - atom:name (string) mandatory - atom:uri (string) - atom:email (string) [atom:Node] > atom:Base - atom:rights (string) + atom:author (atom:Person) multiple - atom:blob (string) mandatory [atom:Entry] > atom:Node - atom:id (string) mandatory - atom:title (string) mandatory - atom:published (date) - atom:updated (date) mandatory - atom:content (string) - atom:link (string) [atom:Feed] > atom:Node, mix:referenceable - atom:id (string) mandatory - atom:icon (string) - atom:logo (string) - atom:title (string) - atom:subtitle (string) - atom:updated (date) + * (atom:Entry) = atom:Entry multiple [ism:SubjectArea] > nt:base, mix:referenceable - atom:name (string) mandatory + * (atom:Feed) = atom:Feed [app:ServiceDocument] > nt:base, mix:referenceable - atom:name (string) mandatory - atom:blob (string)
