On 8/7/07, Vikas Bhatia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regarding workflows, except for jBPM, other open source java workflow > systems seem stagnant or in the case of openWFE heading towards ruby. > > I have been looking at workflows myself and I saw something at jBPM. > http://docs.jboss.com/jbpm/v3.2/userguide/html/docmgmt.html Has anyone > got any experience with this? >
Afaik openWFE is the most advanced one. And even if the guys are working on supporting ruby I don't think they will abandon the java version (but you should direct your questions to their lists). ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. > > > > On 8/7/07, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Take a look at Nuxeo (www.nuxeo.org). Their ECM application uses Jackrabbit > > and has work flow management built on top. > > > > .Steve > > > > > > Torgeir Veimo wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:12 +0200, Stefan Guggisberg wrote: > > > > > > no. workflow engines and e.g. CMS's are applications > > usually built on top of a repository/database. > > jackrabbit is a generic content repository and doesn't > > come with any applications (much like relational databases > > which in general don't support workflows). > > > > It would be interesting to see an example of node type definitions used > > to support workflow though. > > > > > > >
