You are correct. I was wrong. He was talking about re-registering nodetypes. Sorry.
Christoph Kiehl wrote: > > qcfireball wrote: > >> This is not entirely true. I have recently set this up on oyur servers >> to be >> able to do this. For Jackrabbit 1.3, the RMI classes use the "generic" >> RMI >> classes. There are, however, Jackrabbit specific classes that can be >> used >> to enable this type of functionality. > > The original poster was talking about _re_registering nodetypes through > RMI. And that is indeed not possible right now. It is however possible > to register _new_ nodetypes as you state. I thought the original poster > already has this setup working, because he explicitly asked about > _re_registering. But maybe I was on the wrong path. Nevertheless I think > it would be nice to expose the functionality of reregistering through RMI. > > Cheers, > Christoph > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Reregistering-Node-Types-in-RMI-tf4253117.html#a12117480 Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
