OK I'll see if I can replicate in a seperate test case. I guess that'll also allow me to see if its my stuff thats gone wrong. Will the datastore replace these tem binaries in the long term anyway ?
On 9/7/07, Thomas Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry, I don't think I can help you, I don't know enough about the > mechanism. Maybe all temp files older than a day could be removed? > > If you have a simple standalone test case that inserts one blob so > that multiple duplicate temp files are created, please log a bug. > Solving the problem will be very hard without test case... > > I'm currently working on DataStore, where creating temporary files is > avoided (in most cases). But this is not available for version 1.3 of > Jackrabbit... > > Thomas > > > > On 9/7/07, harvey waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No sorry I don't have a test case. I just got a 'Disk Full' error on our > > live server and then took a look in the tomcat temp directory and found > all > > the binaries going back to when we installed the system. I thought these > > binaries were used as a BLOB cache for JackRabbit, if so I guessed there > > might be a way of managing them. > > > > Currently we're on version 1.3 of JackRabbit. > > > > On 9/7/07, Thomas Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > What version did you use, and do you have a simple test case? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Thomas > > > > > > On 9/7/07, harvey waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is there anyway I can stop the bundled PM from filling up the temp > > > directory > > > > in Tomcat. I aslo noticed that on loading a binary into JackRabbit I > > > ended > > > > up with 9 duplicated tmp files. Have I done soemthing wrong here or > is > > > it > > > > JackRabbit ? > > > > > > > > Many Thanks > > > > > > > > Harvery > > > > > > > > > >
