On 9/20/07, Kaizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm using the SimpleDBPersistenceManager as my persistence storage. However, > initializing the repository and saving nodes takes a very long time. The> > same is not observed when using Derby or a file persistence mechanism. Am i
DerbyPersistenceManager and SimpleDbPersistenceManager are, apart from the overridden closeConnection() method, identical. the difference is that derby is an embedded database (i.e. no network overhead), while you're probably using a standalone db (i.e. remote calls). using BundleDbPersistenceManager will provide a significant performance improvement when using a standalone db since it reduces the number of database calls. cheers stefan > missing some configuration settings? What can i do to improve the > performance as its a major concern for me right now? > > Thanks > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Performance-issues-with-DBPersistenceManager-tf4485371.html#a12790799 > Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
