The use case comes from working with jackrabbit. we have a business facade in front of jackrabbit and there is a method to receive a file node by its uuid and one to search within jackrabbit.
we store the uuids in our application and colleague at work had more files to receive and he wants not to call the method to receive the file node for every uuid so he tries to search with a contains for the uuid's, and from that comes the question. a fulltext search for uuid's is absolutly no must for us and we also changed the method to get file nodes for more uuids ... i only want to know why it does not work as jukka find in the code ? BR claus -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von David Nuescheler Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Oktober 2007 11:04 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: AW: another search question ... > Out of curiosity: why would you *ever* want that? I can only second that... I could never imagine that someone would fulltext search UUID's. The "OR" case can also easily be handled by SQL or most efficiently by subsequent calls to getByUUID. Can you elaborate on the use case? regards, david
