Thanks for your reply Thomas, And indeed I read the FAQ's and Wiki but I don't really get the concept of 'Atomic' and multiple Perisistance.
Some wild grasp; couldn't I use 2 'Workspaces' with differrent PersistenceManager? Corné 2008/3/10, Thomas Mueller > Hi, > > I'm not sure if you have read: > http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/PersistenceManagerFAQ > specially 'Consistency / Atomicy' > > > > So is it possible to maintain 2 PersistenceManagers > > > You could write a 'DualPersistenceManager' that stores everything in > both PMs but only reads from one. I did that once; the problem is > configuration (how to configure both at the same time). > > Regards, > > Thomas > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Corné A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have a dispute amongst our developers and can't decide on wich > > PersistenceManager to use on a run a linux 10 box. > > > > some are in favor of a Database PM > > (org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.bundle.MySqlPersistenceManager) > > and some for the File-System PM. > > > > Main arguments concern performance and backup. > > > > Since I think just using both in real-life will resolve the issue. > > So is it possible to maintain 2 PersistenceManagers so we can still > > make a switch. > > > > Thanks > > Corné > > >
