Hi all,
I have discovered what I was doing wrong. All I had to do was to pass in a
string array
private static final String[] MIXIN_TYPES = {"mix:versionable"};
to AbstractJcrDAO's constructor (as a 4th parameter).
rokham wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to use Jcrom to map my POJOs onto Jackrabbit. I've used Jcrom's
> annotation to indicate that my persistent object is versionable like:
>
> @JcrNode(mixinTypes = {"mix:versionable"})
> public class CurnitOtmlImpl{ .....}
>
> I use Jcrom to create the object and once it's created, I set some more
> properties on the object and call update on it. The reason I have to do
> that is because once the object is created certain information is set for
> the object (eg, UUID, object path) which I'm interested to save in
> jackrabbit.
>
> My problem is this:
>
> When I step into the code for
> public abstract class AbstractJcrDAO<T> implements JcrDAO<T> {...}
> abstract class, I get to this method:
>
> protected String update( Node node, T entity, String childNodeFilter, int
> maxDepth ) throws Exception {
> if ( isVersionable ) {
> node.checkout();
> }
> String name = jcrom.updateNode(node, entity, childNodeFilter,
> maxDepth);
> session.save();
> if ( isVersionable ) {
> node.checkin();
> }
> return name;
> }
>
> In the update method above, I realized that "isVersionable" is false and
> therefore my node is not versioned in jackrabbit.
>
> Does anyone happen to know if there's a bug in Jcrom? Is there a quick fix
> I could use to get my stuff working? I believe the problem is with Jcrom
> interpreting the class annotation, indicating that this object is
> versionable.
>
> I really really appreciate any help. I'm under a deadline and like to get
> this done ASAP.
>
> Thank you all in advance,
>
> Rokham
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Versioning-with-Jcrom-tp16758079p16763424.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
