That worked for me. Thanks for all the help!
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tobias Bocanegra Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 2:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: createdBy & version number > "Secondly, is there built-in support to generate the version numbers like > 1.1, 1.2, when checkin or do I have to set version label manually?" no, the name of the version is controlled by the repository. but you can assign your own version labels using VersionHistory.addLabel() -- regards, toby > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tobias Bocanegra > Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 1:35 AM > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: createdBy & version number > > hi, > the root version is the initial version which never has any content. > it is more of a sentinel to make the version graph easier. it is also > the base version of the node when it is made versionable for the first > time, without a root version, the base version would be empty and this > would complicate things alot. this way the following invariants are > always fullfilled: > > - every version but the root version has at least one predecessor version > - every versionable node has a base version (jcr:baseVersion) > > regards, toby > > > On 4/17/08, Zhihai Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks a million, Brett! > > > > Something interesting pops up, though. I added/checked in the node once, > but > > found VersionHistory has two entries. Through frozen node, I can get the > > property "createdBy" with the newer version (base version). The older > > version (root version), however, does not have this property saved. > > > > Then I tested with more check out/in. It turns out that entries in > > VersionHistory is always one more than the number of check out/in. Among > the > > entries, only the root version does not have the property. > > > > I don't quite understand the "extra" root version and why it does not > save > > the property... > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Conoly, Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 11:57 AM > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: RE: createdBy & version number > > > > Took me a little while to find that also, but in order to get the > > properties of the version you have to > > getNode(JcrConstants.jcr_frozenNode).getProperty("createdBy") or > > something like that. To better explain it, the versions have a > > frozenNode associated with them that contains readonly properties of > > that version. > > Hope this helps, > > Brett > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Zhihai Liu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 11:53 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: createdBy & version number > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have a couple of questions regarding to the use of version. > > > > > > > > Firstly, it is my understanding that there is no built-in support to > > save > > the username who check in the node in version history. So I use a > > property > > "createdBy". > > > > // set createdBy > > > > node.setProperty("createdBy", session.getUserID()); > > > > session.save(); > > > > node.checkin(); > > > > > > > > Then I found that I cannot retrieve it from base version or version > > history. > > > > > > // retrieve from base version > > > > String createdBy; > > > > Version baseVersion = node.getBaseVersion(); > > > > if (baseVersion.hasProperty("createdBy")) { > > > > createdBy = baseVersion.getProperty("createdBy").getString(); > > > > } > > > > > > > > But it is saved correctly and can be retrieved from node. > > > > // retrieve from node > > > > String createdBy = node.getProperty("createdBy").getString(); > > > > > > > > I know that versions are different nodes in repository. Don't they keep > > all > > the data that is saved before checkin? Did I do something wrong? > > > > > > > > Secondly, is there built-in support to generate the version numbers like > > 1.1, 1.2, when checkin or do I have to set version label manually? > > > > > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > > > > > > > > >
