On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Tobias Bocanegra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/28/08, Stefan Guggisberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> i don't know how you determined that limit but it's IMO rather defensive. >> tests that i've run a while ago showed that there's no significant >> performance impact with up to 10k child nodes (which is quite a lot). > ok then :-) keep it below 10k :-)
Oh, sorry, I was just giving a pessimistic guestimated limit when I said 1000. Good to know that 10k is also working fine. Alex -- Alexander Klimetschek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
