Hi, On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 4:47 AM, MARTINEZ Antonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Is JCR170, or the extensions provided in JackRabbit 1.4 fully SQL > compliant ?
No, JSR 170 specifies a relatively tight SQL subset (for example no joins) and Jackrabbit only extends that subset a bit. > - Is there a performance difference between the two query query > languages ? No. Both XPath and SQL are parsed into an abstract in-memory query tree that the underlying query engine uses. The performance of equivalent XPath and SQL queries is thus practically the same. BR, Jukka Zitting
