thanks for the suggestion, but from what I can tell I think this would
only work for same-named nodes, and my nodes all have different names.
cheers,
Josh
On 25 Jun 2008, at 13:24, scytacki wrote:
How about this hacky way of doing it:
get the path of the current node. look at the index inside of '['
']'.
Then construct a path for the previous and next nodes.
Scott
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/following-sibling-etc.-tp18094659p18110078.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
