Hi --

Yes, indeed, I am saying that saying that the new *property definitions* are
not reflected  in the content representation of your nodetype
under /jcr:system/jcr:nodeTypes.

I read this content representation on the client side.

What does it mean to "refresh the tree"? I start a fresh client side program each time to read the content representation. I guess that the related question is, how do I know the re-registration was successful?

I have an idea -- should I try dumping out the /jcr:system tree on the server side right after re-registration to see what I get?

Betty



----- Original Message ----- From: "Angela Schreiber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 12:25 AM
Subject: Re: what does NodeTypeRegistry.reregisterNodeType() do?


hi betty

Hmm, I don't know if I explained my problem well enough.

maybe i was just misleaded... i had the impression that
the reregistration of the nodetype was successful and there
remains a problem in the jcr2spi.

However, if I try to add new properties to existing node types in the CND file, the reregistration does not seem to do anything
because the new properties never show up when I dump the tree.

ok, you are saying that the new *property definitions* are
not reflect in the content representation of your nodetype
under /jcr:system/jcr:nodeTypes.

is that correct?
did you refresh the tree?

if yes:
are you sure, the reregistration on the server was successful?
i'm not totally sure, if this is the case.

If I try to add new content using those new properties, the
program will complain because it does not think those properties exist.

yes, that could be caused by various things:

- registration was not successful (see above)
- nodetype definition on the client does not reflect the most
  recent one on the server (see reasons explained in the previous
  mail).

so, what i'd like to understand first: was the reregistration
of the nodetype definition (with the additional property
definition) really successful?

did you already send the nt-definition (before and after)?
maybe that would be helpful.

thanks
angela


Reply via email to