On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:19, Boni Gopalan (BioImagene) <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Christopher:
>
> The recursive beans get persisted without any problems. So it was a non
> issue. I need a quick help on persisting an Enum. Is there a converter
> available?, Should I have to implement a custom converter? If so would
> it be an Atomic Converter or a Bean Converter?
Yes I think so.
I think both can be used depending on your enum.
If you have a single atomic value inside the Enum, it should be nice to have
a Atomic converter.
If you have multiple fields inside the Enum, a specific BeanConverter
becomes interesting. eg. :
public enum Planet {
MERCURY (3.303e+23, 2.4397e6),
VENUS (4.869e+24, 6.0518e6),
EARTH (5.976e+24, 6.37814e6),
MARS (6.421e+23, 3.3972e6),
JUPITER (1.9e+27, 7.1492e7),
SATURN (5.688e+26, 6.0268e7),
URANUS (8.686e+25, 2.5559e7),
NEPTUNE (1.024e+26, 2.4746e7),
PLUTO (1.27e+22, 1.137e6);
private final double mass; // in kilograms
private final double radius; // in meters
Planet(double mass, double radius) {
this.mass = mass;
this.radius = radius;
}
public double mass() { return mass; }
public double radius() { return radius; }
// universal gravitational constant (m3 kg-1 s-2)
public static final double G = 6.67300E-11;
public double surfaceGravity() {
return G * mass / (radius * radius);
}
public double surfaceWeight(double otherMass) {
return otherMass * surfaceGravity();
}
>
>
> On another note : I had a need to update multiple objects based on a
> Query. Since there were no suitable methods available I extended your
> ObjectContentManagerImpl and implemented an updated method that accepts
> a node iterator and Object as parameters. Did I reinvent any wheels?
>
Can you give more details ? What kind of update is it ?
>
> Thanks
> Boni
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christophe Lombart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 September 2008 14:47
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Jackrabbit:OCM : Recursive Same Type Objects
>
> for a bean, no problem but we have to check this specific case within
> Collection.
> We have to add a unit test and a bug fix if needed.
>
> It is not working, please create a jira issue. I can work on it.
>
> Christophe
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:19, Boni Gopalan (BioImagene) <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi , I have a need to persist objects of the following structure.
> >
> > Class Foo{
> > String id;
> > List<Foo> children;
> > }
> >
> > Is it possible to achieve a proper mapping with XML mappings? Is
> there
> > any recursion stopper that will stop me at runtime??, I see an ominous
> > test config file named : jcrmapping-avoidrecursiveloop in the trunk!!
> >
> > Sorry, I should have rather tried it first before asking: Very tight
> > deadline !!
> >
> > Thanks
> > Boni
> >
>
