Marcel Reutegger wrote:
>
>
> jackrabbit currently filters the complete result set using the path
> constraint
> to compute the size of the result. we might change this in the future and
> do it
> on a lazy basis. that would improve the performance but at the same time
> you
> loose the result size information. i.e. Node/RowIterator.getSize() would
> return -1.
>
Hi Marcel,
I don't understand "... loose the result size information. i.e.
Node/RowIterator.getSize() would return -1".
Do you mean when we're using property constraint instead of path constraint,
we can't use RowIterators.getSize() from QueryResult?
Regards,
Van
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/File-search-order-by-jcr%3Acontent-properties-tp20224106p20336227.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
