Hi guys!
I'm new to JackRabbit and now I'm in process of testing JackRabbit OCM
feature.
I'm stuck with the following issue:
I have class Parent:
@Node
class Parent {
@Field
private String text;
public String getText(){
return this.text;
}
public void setText(String text){
this.text = text;
}
}
and child class:
@Node(extend=Parent.class)
class Child {
private String y;
@Override
public String getText(){
return this.y;
}
@Override
public void setText(String text){
this.y = text;
}
}
and doing following:
:
Child child = new Child();
child.setText("this is child"); // as I understand that code save to "y"
attribute
ocm.insert(child);
ocm.save();
QueryManager manager = ocm.getQueryManager();
Filter filter = manager.createFilter(AdvTextQuestionData.class);
filter.addLike("text", "%this is child%");
Query query = manager.createQuery(filter);
Collection t1 = ocm.getObjects(query);
:.
In result, collection isn't empty because OCM saves to repository to the
"text" property(annotated field in Parent class) following value: "this is
child" Why?
Actually I don't set this field and for me it's strange behavior: maybe
someone knows something about that?
Tnx a lot, Eraskin Alexey!
