I found my answer in the release notes of Jackrabbit 1.5.2. I was not aware of the standalone server process Regards, Antonio
-----Original Message----- From: MARTINEZ Antonio [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 7:44 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Bootstrap Jackrabbit without container Hello, I'm currently using Jackrabbit 1.4.4 in a cluster configuration (3 App servers running JBoss). The persistence manager I'm using is MySql, which is running in a DB server (actually 2 DB servers in redundant configuration) Everything is working fine, except that now I'm facing the problem that I can not perform an online backup (since the local indexing of one of the App servers is required). On top of that, in the near future I need to support geo-redundancy, which seams kind of impossible with the current configuration. To be able to support online backup and geo redundancy, the data (DB + local index) should actually be in the DB server, to simplify the scripts in charge of those features. I'm thinking of changing the architecture and run a single JackRabbit instance in the DB server and use RMI to access the repository from the App servers. Now, in the DB server we are not running any container, just MySql, so my question is if there would be any issue bootstrapping Jackrabbit without container. Any other experiences running this configuration are really appreciated: any architecture issue with this approach, performance, etc.. Thanks, Antonio
