so please does anyone can tell me in which cases REMOVE permissions are checked in JR 1.4. When i remove a node a WRITE permission is checked on parent node instead of a REMOVE one. why?
----- Original Message ----- Da : "Alessandro Cosenza" <[email protected]> A : [email protected] Oggetto : Re: removing a node needs to verify a WRITE or a REMOVE permission? Data : Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:13:01 +0100 > i'm using 1.4 > > ----- Original Message ----- > Da : Angela Schreiber <[email protected]> > A : [email protected] > Oggetto : Re: removing a node needs to verify a WRITE or a > REMOVE permission? > Data : Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:11:02 +0100 > > > hi > > > > what version of jackrabbit are you using? > > > > with the initial steps for jsr 283 security features > > the AccessManager permissions have been deprecated. > > > > as far as i am aware of AccessManager.isGranted(ItemId, > > int) is (with the latest version of jackrabbit) only > > used for READ access and those are prone to be replaced > > as well. > > > > angela > > > > > hi, > > > when i call a Node.remove() method it seems JR always > > > try to check > > > a WRITE permission (not a REMOVE one) in my > > > AccessManagerImpl.isGranted(). > > > i could think it's right, but in which cases a REMOVE > > > permission is checked? > > > thanks in advance. > > > > > > > >
