Hi, > jackrabbit-core.jar - 1.4.1
I suggest to use the most recent version of Jackrabbit core. See also: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html Regards, Thomas On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Alexander Wallace<[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder if my issue is related to: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2063 > > Alexander Wallace wrote: >> >> Thanks for the clarification! >> >> I'm still baffled by the behavior presented by the garbage collection >> process for the data store... >> >> I've disabled it for now, but that means that I'll start accumulating >> unused documents... Although that's way better than loosing most documents >> arbitrarily. >> >> Again, thanks! >> >> Alexander Klimetschek wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Alexander Wallace<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> jackrabbit-api.jar - 1.4.0 >>>> jackrabbit-core.jar - 1.4.1 >>>> jackrabbit-jcr-commons.jar - 1.4.0 >>>> jackrabbit-spi.jar - 1.4.0 >>>> jackrabbit-spi-commons.jar - 1.4.0 >>>> jackrabbit-text-extractors.jar - 1.4.0 >>>> >>>> It seems wrong that I have a core 1.4.1 and 1.4.0 for the rest of the >>>> stuff... But that's how the framework i have came (liferay 5.1.2) >>>> >>> >>> No, that's right. For patch releases (the third part of the version >>> number), only the jars that actually have changed get an increase in >>> the version number, the rest is not released again. In this case, >>> jackrabbit-core got a change, but not all the others. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Alex >>> >>> >> >> >
