Hello, One thing i notice on FileDataStore even if i perform delete in my application the files are still there in repository/datastore directory...does datastore behaves like that, you can only add entry? never delete?
Alexander Klimetschek wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 3:34 PM, freak182<[email protected]> wrote: >> <PersistenceManager >> class="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.bundle.BundleFsPersistenceManager" >> /> > > A database based bundle persistence manager is recommended, as the > filesystem ones (eg. BundleFsPersistenceManager) are prone to > inconsistencies as they are not transactional. For embedded scenarios > without an existing (remote) database, the Derby bundle PM is useful. > >> 1. Do still need a DataSore? what DataStore i use for production? > > A datastore is optional. See [1] to [3]. > >> 2. what is the difference between a DataStore and FileSystem? > > Also see the links. > >> 3. what is the best combination of DataStore and PM for production use? >> and >> for clustering? > > Bundle database PMs are good, and the FileDataStore is good for > performance. If you must have everything in the database, a db > datastore might be better. > >> side question: >> 4. How to configure DatabaseFileSystem? > > Configuration of repository.xml elements are described on the > configuration page [1] and in more detail in the javadocs of the > class, eg. for the DbFileSystem it's [4]. > > [1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/jackrabbit-configuration.html > [2] http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/PersistenceManagerFAQ > [3] http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/DataStore > [4] > http://jackrabbit.apache.org/api/1.5/org/apache/jackrabbit/core/fs/db/DbFileSystem.html > > Regards, > Alex > > -- > Alexander Klimetschek > [email protected] > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-LocalFileSystem-and-DataStore-%28File-and-DB%29-tp25223633p25224674.html Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
