Hi,

I found the relevant section of the spec:
http://www.day.com/specs/jcr/2.0/6_Query.html#6.7.4%20Name
Name ::= '[' quotedName ']' | '[' simpleName ']' | simpleName
simpleName ::= /* A JCR Name that is also a legal SQL identifier  */
See the SQL:92 rules for <regular identifier> (in ISO/IEC 9075:1992 §
5.2 <token> and <separator>).
As far as I read the SQL-92 spec, this basically means the same rules
as for Java identifiers apply.

I guess we should have railroad diagrams. I will try to create them.

Regards,
Thomas




On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Thomas Müller <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Try:
>
> select * from [nt:unstructured] where [jcr:path] like
> '/%/unitTestPage' and [cms:nodeType] = 'page'
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Rakesh Vidyadharan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Since XPath is deprecated in JCR 2.0, I am trying to move to JCR_SQL2
>> (JR-2.0-beta1).  I have the following XPath query:
>>
>> //unittestpa...@cms:nodeType = 'page']
>>
>> I tried writing the query in SQL as:
>>
>> select * from nt:unstructured where jcr:path like '/%/unitTestPage' and
>> cms:nodeType = 'page'
>>
>> This statement however fails with an exception:
>>
>> javax.jcr.query.InvalidQueryException: Query:
>> select * from nt:(*)unstructured where jcr:path like '/%/unitTestFolder' and
>> cms:nodeType = 'page'; expected: <end>
>>        at
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.commons.query.sql2.Parser.getSyntaxError(Parser.java:968)
>>        at
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.commons.query.sql2.Parser.createQueryObjectModel(Parser.java:124)
>>        at
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.commons.query.sql2.SQL2QOMBuilder.createQueryObjectModel(SQL2QOMBuilder.java:55)
>>        at
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.QOMQueryFactory.createQuery(QOMQueryFactory.java:69)
>>        at
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.CompoundQueryFactory.createQuery(CompoundQueryFactory.java:67)
>>        at
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.QueryManagerImpl.createQuery(QueryManagerImpl.java:98)
>>
>> Can some one tell me what I am missing?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Rakesh
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to