On 17 Nov 2009, at 5:32:13 AM, Ard Schrijvers wrote:
> I do not agree, and fortunately, mapping jcr nodes to simple java
> objects which again can be accessed from jsp / freemarker / velocity
> scripts feels much more natural to me, is quite easy: I do not want to
> burden other developers with handling all the jcr stuff, catching all
> the exceptions, handling defaults, writing complex queries (do you
> really like to write search queries? It is part of the JCR API, but I
> am glad I went through all that once, and made a simple java interface
> for it (similar to jr-ocm, only targeted for large repositories
> avoiding slow queries, and supporting more website convenient
> searches, like multiple scoped kind of queries).

I am using 
http://kenai.com/projects/jcrcms/sources/svn/content/trunk/src/app/com/sptci/cms/site/model/NodeBean.java?rev=17
 - a simple generic map wrapper around a node that can be used for tempting 
systems easily.  Not final yet, but it works.

Rakesh

Reply via email to