Hi all, Still no idea on how I can avoid theses temporary files?
Thanks, Julien On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Julien Poffet <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > I just read about migration support on > http://jackrabbit.apache.org/standalone-server.html#StandaloneServer-Backupandmigration > : > > Note that the source repository must not be running when you use this > feature. If the target repository already exist, then all content inside it > is overwritten. Note also that the search indexes of the target repository > will be generated only when the repository is next started. This keeps the > disk size of the backup smaller, but causes a notable startup delay > especially for large repositories if you need to restore that backup. > > Unfortunately it is not acceptable that the target repository will be > completely overwritten... > > That was probably one of the reason why I get into the importation over > WebDav thing... > > Any other idea? > > Cheers, > Julien > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Julien Poffet <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Ok I'll give it a try... >> >> We can't upgrade to 1.6 due to some library dependency. But our version of >> 1.5.7 is now almost a 1.6 due to our custom patches ;-) >> >> The will upgrade later to 1.6 but right now we have to make this >> importation with the 1.5.7 and this temporary cache files is a problem that >> we have to solve ASAP... >> >> Thanks for your help >> >> Best regards, >> Julien >> >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Jukka Zitting >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Julien Poffet <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Actually I run the version 1.6 for the source WebDav but my target >>> > repository runs under the version 1.5.7 of Jackrabbit. >>> > >>> > Since the version of my target repository is lower than 1.6 it wouldn't >>> > work? right? >>> >>> Not sure. There hasn't been major changes to the persistence formats, >>> so depending a bit on your choice of persistence managers it might >>> just work. At least it's probably worth a try. >>> >>> Is there a reason why you can't upgrade the target repository to 1.6? >>> >>> BR, >>> >>> Jukka Zitting >>> >> >> >
