On 1/21/10 2:24 PM, ChadDavis wrote:
In the JCR 2.0 specification, one of the built in node types appears
to inherit from a mixin type.
To be specific:
[nt:hierarchyNode]> mix:created abstract
Doesn't this mean that hierachyNode, a primary node type, uses a mixin
type as a it's superclass? In other words, it doesn't have nt:base in
it's ancestor hierarchy? And that's fine?
It isn't necessary to explicitly declare nt:base. It's implicit. As Alex
said in a different thread, it is analogous to Object in Java.
Justin
