On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 14:47, Alexander Klimetschek <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 13:33, Marcel Reutegger > <[email protected]> wrote: >> jackrabbit does it in a similar way for quite some time now. > > To me it sounds like this partial-temporary-indexing feature should be > part of Lucene directly (configurable, of course).
well, it's not that easy. jackrabbit makes use of many assumptions and implementation specific properties of the content that is indexed. e.g. nodes are uniquely identifiable and it is not required to immediately persist the index on commit. it is sufficient that a redo log contains enough information to replay the changes. all this cannot be moved easily into a more generic library like lucene. however there is interesting work going on with the near-real-time index that we might want to use in the future. regards marcel > Regards, > Alex > > -- > Alexander Klimetschek > [email protected] >
