On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 23:24, ChadDavis <chadmichaelda...@gmail.com> wrote: > 1) Performance ? Is there any difference in performance?
No, they all use the same lucene index under the hood, ie. they all get transformed into a lucene index query. > 2) Ease of use . . . is there any sense that the ease of use varies among > them? Well, that depends on personal choice. I think that Xpath is a very good fit for tree structures (and that's why I think it's sad that it became deprecated in JCR 2.0, albeit it will live on in Jackrabbit). > 3) Functionality . . . are there any differences in functionality? JCR-SQL2 / JCR-JQOM in JCR 2.0 most notably support joins, which is not possible with the older xpath and sql. > 4) Other differentiating factors ? Are there any other reasons to > consider when making a selection from the four? I would assume > developer familiarity is a obvious one, others? I think 2) and 3) are the ones that should drive your decision. Regards, Alex -- Alexander Klimetschek alexander.klimetsc...@day.com
