You may want to consider using JNDI if you're actually trying to map to a physical filesystem - JCR is better, mind, in that it provides a more useful document-oriented feature set, but if you're actually NEEDING to work with the filesystem, a directory structure is one of the samples for JNDI.
2010/4/1 Tim Terlegård <[email protected]> > 2010/4/1 Alexander Klimetschek <[email protected]>: > > 2010/4/1 Tim Terlegård <[email protected]>: > >> Is it possible to get a nice file hierarchy and not these random > >> numbers? And is it possible to store the files as plain text instead > >> of binary? > > > > No. In order to provide the features that JCR offers (eg. finer > > granularity) compared to a normal file system, it is hard to map it > > 1:1 to the file system, while still being performant. > > > > See also http://markmail.org/message/3o26qhrls2u4sj4q > > > *> I would recommend to use the H2 or Derby embedded BundleDBPMs together > > with a FileDataStore for best performance and full local storage. > > Thank you very much. > > Tim > -- Joseph B. Ottinger http://enigmastation.com
