2010/5/26 François Cassistat <[email protected]>: > Thanks Alex, > > but that's what I fear, it makes JQOM queries more complex. > > Also, I don't know if by chance you would know if a JQOM join is a fast as a > path operation on a subnode like on the XPath example above. > >>> //*[... and path/to/subnode/@value='somevalue' and ...]
They both are being translated to a ,most likely the same, lucene query, so there should be no difference in execution time Ard > > > > Frank > > > > Le 2010-05-26 à 9:50 AM, Alexander Klimetschek a écrit : > >> 2010/5/21 François Cassistat <[email protected]>: >>> I'm learning JQOM. Just one question, in XPath, I used to do queries like : >>> >>> //*[... and path/to/subnode/@value='somevalue' and ...] >>> >>> in JQOM, I can't use this : >>> qom.comparison >>> ( >>> qom.propertyValue("mainselector", "path/to/subnode/@value"), >>> qom.JCR_OPERATOR_EQUAL_TO, >>> qom.literal(value.createValue("somevalue")) >>> ) >>> >>> it gives : >>> Exception in thread "main" javax.jcr.query.InvalidQueryException: '/' not >>> allowed in name >>> >>> Is it possible to do something like this? or should I need to do a join ? >> >> Not sure, but I think you need a join in this case, using sth like >> ISDESCENDANTNODE(). >> >> Regards, >> Alex >> >> -- >> Alexander Klimetschek >> [email protected] > >
