It might be a late reply but we i saw at least in JR 2.0 is that when session.save() happens it also forces a sync first so that the JR node gets up-to-date first.
We also see the degradation in performance the more nodes we put in the cluster. The global lock forces to make every session.save() sequential since it acquires a global lock. My 2 cents On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Thomas Müller <thomas.muel...@day.com>wrote: > Hi, > > > automatic sync and the manual Session.refresh() have essentially the > > same result? > > I think so. > > > Should this be something you should know? > > I don't plan to find out, sorry. I didn't write the cluster code, and > I don't feel responsible for it :-) > > Regards, > Thomas > -- Patricio.-