It might be a late reply but we i saw at least in JR 2.0 is that when
session.save() happens it also forces a sync first so that the JR node gets
up-to-date first.

We also see the degradation in performance the more nodes we put in the
cluster. The global lock forces to make every session.save() sequential
since it acquires a global lock.

My 2 cents

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Thomas Müller <thomas.muel...@day.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > automatic sync and the manual Session.refresh() have essentially the
> > same result?
>
> I think so.
>
> > Should this be something you should know?
>
> I don't plan to find out, sorry. I didn't write the cluster code, and
> I don't feel responsible for it :-)
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>



-- 
Patricio.-

Reply via email to