> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 19:21, ChadDavis <[email protected]> wrote: >> I simply need to know which search interface is the most fully >> implemented. I've asked this before, but received no good answer. I >> scoured the mail list archives and discovered that this may be a bit >> of a controversial topic; perhaps people are trying not to speak? >> >> It seems that JQOM is not fully implemented, while it seems that XPATH >> is.
Well, XPath or SQL are not "fully implemented" either as a matter of fact: No case-insensitive ordering. Even if that would comply to the specs... then I would say that the specs are not fully specified. But apparently this should finally work with JQOM I read somewhere. So I guess I'm looking forward to this although I really started to get a hang of XPath. Oh well, learn something new every day - otherwise we would get bored now, wouldn't we ;-) -will
