Hi, On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Seidel. Robert <[email protected]> wrote: > This helped a little bit. I've stored 26000 nodes and the performance is now > relatively > stable at 6-7 nodes per second (currently it takes 16 seconds to store 100 > nodes).
That's still notably bad performance. Do you get similar performance when you run your code against the default Jackrabbit configuration (i.e. an embedded Derby database for persistence)? If yes, can you share the relevant parts of your code (preferably in the form of a simple test case like [1]) so we can see if there's anything that could cause such bad performance. [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/trunk/test/performance/base/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/performance/SmallFileWriteTest.java BR, Jukka Zitting
