You Rock! I'll try it today and also scope out the resource/jdbc connection loss issue.
-- Langley On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 02/10/2011 11:26 PM, John Langley wrote: > >> I looked at "back porting" the 2881 to 2.1.3 locally. But it appears >> that just using the change set from 2881 and "pretty blindly copying >> it" into the 2.1.3 code base doesn't work, apparently there are other >> changes needed too. >> > > Yes, the JCR-2881 change depends on earlier changes in JCR-2865. I merged > both changes to the 2.1 branch in revision 1069811. > > -- > Jukka Zitting >
