On 4/29/11 10:14 AM, Serge Huber wrote:
Hi guys,
I would like to submit today a paper for the ApacheCon 2011 about our
experience on integrating Jackrabbit as a central part of our product. The main
idea to talk about the reasons of adopting Jackrabbit as an core part any web
solution, the advantages/disadvantages, give some feedback about how things
played out in our case from both from a technical and project management point
of view, and of course talk a little about the future of Jackrabbit, also in
regards to other technologies such as CMIS and the new WCM/WEM OASIS proposal.
I would also take the opportunity to share our overall experience of working
with Apache projects, as well as talking about how we see our continued
involvement, the pitfalls we have experienced, and the lessons we learned.
sounds good
The title of this presentation would be "Integrating Jackrabbit : why, how and what's
next", and the abstract would be something like this : "Recently, a lot of
controversy has arisen about the benefits of technologies such as the JCR.
what kind of controversy?
Thanks
Michael
In this presentation we talk about why and how selecting Jackrabbit as a core
technology makes sense, what other alternatives were tried before, how the
experience has been, performance, what the future looks like and how it measures
compared to alternatives".
It is my hope that this presentation will help people see all the value in
Jackrabbit that it deserves, as I believe it is a project that has achieved a
lot in a very short amount of time.
I welcome any feedback, experience and suggestions you might have, even if
negative :) I also would love any references you can give me about Jackrabbit
3, as I must say I am a bit behind on the discussions about the new
architecture.
Best regards,
Serge Huber.
