On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Guillaume Belrose <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Stefan, > > The API looks quite simple, so I might have a go. > > By the way, I did a quick Google search, and BDB was supported in > previous versions of Jackrabbit. The last trace I could find dates > from version 1.1 > See > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/tags/1.1/contrib/bdb-persistence/ > > Did it go away because of licenses issues?
yes cheers stefan > > Cheers, > > Guillaume. > > > > On 27 April 2012 11:09, Stefan Guggisberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> hi guillaume, >> >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Guillaume Belrose <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> I am wondering if Berkeley DB Java edition is a database that is or >>> could be supported by Jackrabbit. All information I found on the >>> subject is quite a bit dated (circa 2007). >> >> support for berkeley db java edition should be straightforward to implement. >> jackrabbit's persistence layer abstraction (the PersistenceManager interface) >> fits nicely with key-value stores. >> >> i suggest you have a look at [1] and [2]. it should be relatively easy to >> extend >> a berkeley-based implementation from [1]. >> >> cheers >> stefan >> >> [1] >> http://jackrabbit.apache.org/api/2.4/org/apache/jackrabbit/core/persistence/bundle/AbstractBundlePersistenceManager.html >> [2] >> http://jackrabbit.apache.org/api/2.4/org/apache/jackrabbit/core/persistence/mem/InMemBundlePersistenceManager.html >>> Many thanks in advance. >>> Guillaume.
