> On 16.10.2013, at 09:19, Julian Reschke <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 2013-10-15 15:50, Christoph Läubrich wrote: >> > "stable" and "working with every client" are two very different things. >> You are right, sorry for using inadequate wording :-) >> >> > Out of curiosity: what was the problem that you encountered? >> >> I wasn't able to mount the WebDav neither under Linux nor Windows >> releiable (while "other" WebDavs like Apache worked) sometimes it worked >> for one of them (I think I finally got it working under Windows using >> Sling, but not JackRabbit Standalone) , in a Webbrowser it worked but >> all file nodes where not accessible as files (there was a posting in the >> newsgroup as well). > > Well, it can be a problem of the client; I recall that the Windows WebDAV > driver makes incorrect assumptions about servers, and there's little > Jackrabbit can do about that > (<http://www.greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/webdav-redirector-list.html#issue-server-discovery>). > > And when you say "Webbrowser" -- what does this have to do with WebDAV? > > Best regards, Julian
indeed the reality of webdav is that in order to be truly you need to spend a lot of time adding special code to deal with various broken client implementations. regards, Lukas
