Hi Clay, On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 16:06 -0500, Clay Ferguson wrote: > that url works for me. However it's such a shame the spec hasn't been > updated since 2009. The whole world thinks the JCR is dead, but > mailny > because they never heard of it in the first place. It's tempting to > just > ditch JCR and code directly against MongoDB+Lucene. I mean it's been > since > 2009 and still you ask most java devs if they've ever heard of JCR > and the > answer is no. So sad that the technology is dying such a slow painful > death.
My answer is non-authoritative, since I haven't been involved with the JCR spec at all. That being said, there is _a lot_ of activity going on in the implementation space, and I think that Oak has found many good avenues for innovation without needing to touch the JCR API. So I don't think that the statement about the technology ( JCR I assume ) is dying is correct. However, we could definitely make more noise about JCR/Oak and their benefits. Thanks, Robert > > Best regards, > Clay Ferguson > [email protected] > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Torgeir Veimo <[email protected] > om> > wrote: > > > > > There's a number of pages on the net that references the url > > http://www.day.com/specs/jcr/2.0/ > > > > This url doesn't work anymore though. Does anyone know of any other > > location which has the jcr 2.0 spec online? > > > > -- > > -Tor > >
