I apologise, my subject line is not fitting. But, if I upgrade to oak ... What's the odds this would solve my problem?
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 13:29 Eric Berryman <eric.berry...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello! > > I have an application that uses jackrabbit to save images, using the > database filestore. > I have jackrabbit clustered (node1, node2). > This was working for me fine, but I started seeing an oddity. > Node1 inserts an image, but node2 doesn't seem to see it when queried > anymore. > So, node2 is now missing about the last 2 weeks of images. > I can see the correct image as a blob in the jcr_ds_DATASTORE table. > > And, node2 logged that the journal has been applied. > The LOCAL_REVISIONS table shows both nodes have a revision id of 605 > (although I do have 1364 images). > > I've tried adding enableConsistencyCheck=true and > forceConsistencyCheck=true to the index part of the repository.xml file. > But, I don't see any errors. Just, that the consistency check happened. > > I've also tried clearing the index directory of node2. Jackrabbit > recreates the index, applies the 605 journal entries, then ends up in the > same state without the last two weeks of images. > > Are there any ideas to fix what seems to be an index issue. > > Any help or ideas to troubleshoot are greatly appreciated. > (jackrabbit 2.6) > > Thank you! > Eric >
