You can always try running with a shaded oak-lucene dependency, see https://github.com/tveimo/oak-lucene-shaded
compile 'com.github.tveimo:oak-lucene-shaded:1.24.0' On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 02:52, Francis Nguyen <fr.ngu...@mail.utoronto.ca> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Has anyone gotten oak org.apache.jackrabbit/oak-solr-osgi/1.8.8 running > alongside org.apache.jackrabbit/oak-lucene/1.8.8? It appears that > oak-solr-osgi uses SolR version 5.5.5 (which requires Lucene 5.0), but > oak-lucene will use Lucene version 4.7.1. The result of loading both of them > on a sling instance is that I can get the two of them loaded together, but > when I try to create a SolR index I get the following error (and a few > subsequent errors relaying the same information): > > 10.02.2020 11:44:33.160 *ERROR* [coreLoadExecutor-6-thread-1] > org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer Error creating core [oak]: An SPI class of > type org.apache.lucene.codecs.PostingsFormat with name 'Lucene50' does not > exist. You need to add the corresponding JAR file supporting this SPI to > your classpath. The current classpath supports the following names: > [completion] > org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: An SPI class of type > org.apache.lucene.codecs.PostingsFormat with name 'Lucene50' does not exist. > You need to add the corresponding JAR file supporting this SPI to your > classpath. The current classpath supports the following names: [completion] > at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.<init>(SolrCore.java:820) > [org.apache.jackrabbit.oak-solr-osgi:1.8.8] > at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.<init>(SolrCore.java:658) > [org.apache.jackrabbit.oak-solr-osgi:1.8.8] > at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.create(CoreContainer.java:820) > [org.apache.jackrabbit.oak-solr-osgi:1.8.8] > at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.access$000(CoreContainer.java:90) > [org.apache.jackrabbit.oak-solr-osgi:1.8.8] > at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$1.call(CoreContainer.java:473) > [org.apache.jackrabbit.oak-solr-osgi:1.8.8] > at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$1.call(CoreContainer.java:464) > [org.apache.jackrabbit.oak-solr-osgi:1.8.8] > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) > at > org.apache.solr.common.util.ExecutorUtil$MDCAwareThreadPoolExecutor$1.run(ExecutorUtil.java:231) > [org.apache.jackrabbit.oak-solr-osgi:1.8.8] > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > I did some digging and I think the problem is that the same version of both > oak-solr-osgi and oak-lucene contain > META-INF/services/org.apache.lucene.codecs.PostingsFormat, but while > oak-solr-osgi exports > org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.document.Completion50PostingsFormat in > there, oak-lucene exports > org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.Lucene40PostingsFormat and > org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene41.Lucene41PostingsFormat. (I'd post a link to > the source but I'm not sure how this mailing list handles links) > > Has anyone gotten these two packages running together? I'd ideally like to > use both Lucene indexes and SolR indexes in my database, and found it odd > that the two seem incompatible even when both packages are the same version. > > Sorry if this is the wrong mailing list -- I wasn't sure which one to send > this to. > > Thanks, > Francis Nguyen -- -Tor
