The 1.1 test suite does contain tests for MINUS but AFAICT the ARQ trunk does not contain these. I was actually asking about this in a separate thread on the dev list the other day. Presumably at least Andy has them somewhere because he produces EARL reports re: ARQ's SPARQL 1.1 compliance but it doesn't look like that test suite is anywhere obvious in SVN yet
Rob Rob Vesse -- YarcData.com -- A Division of Cray Inc Software Engineer, Bay Area m: 925.960.3941 | o: 925.264.4729 | @: [email protected] | Skype: rvesse 6210 Stoneridge Mall Rd | Suite 120 | Pleasanton CA, 94588 On 6/14/12 1:14 PM, "Paul Gearon" <[email protected]> wrote: >OK, I have a patch that does much better for the case where all >variables are bound. Unfortunately, it doesn't do anything special if >there are unbound values. In that case it just reverts to the linear >search again. > >It'd be possible to build indexes based on a knowledge of what *could* >be unbound, but that was going to take more static analysis than I had >time for last night. :-) > >Anyway, it seems to be running correctly, but I want to run a decent >set of tests against it before posting the patch. It seems that there >aren't any tests for MINUS in the SPARQL test suite, so it looks like >I need to do that too. :-) > >Paul > >On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 13/06/12 21:52, Alex Hall wrote: >>> >>> The difficult part there is going to be finding the common >>> variables. >> >> >> (haven't had time to catch up and all the interesting email about this >>on >> both the lists yet ...) >> >> Just on this point - much of that can be done by static analysis. It >> provides a superset of the variables as some may not actually be bound >>for a >> given row. >> >> Andy >>
