Doh, Google did it to me again. I should have noticed it in the URL.
thanks,
tim
>________________________________
> From: Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org>
>To: users@jena.apache.org
>Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 12:52 PM
>Subject: Re: SPARUL grammar question for ARQ
>
>On 18/06/12 20:38, Tim Harsch wrote:
>> According to sparql.org this parses: DELETE WHERE { ?s ?p ?o }
>>
>> According to the spec empty brackets are required in the construct
>> template.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/Submission/SPARQL-Update/#rConstructTemplate
>>
>> Is this an extension for ARQ, or am I mis-reading the grammar? Is
>> there a pedantic parser for the updates that would parse only valid
>> 1.1 syntax for updates (as there is for query) ?
>
>Your reading the wrong spec :-) The ARQ's update parser is pedantic, as
>you put it, and that is what you get with syntax SPARQL.
>
>SPARQL Update - as will become a W3C Recommendation is:
>
>http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/
>
>While the submission was input at the start of the WG process, the
>resulting language has moved on.
>
>One feature added is the
>
>DELETE WHERE { ?s ?p ?o }
>
>shortcut
>http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml#deleteWhere
>
>which is equivalent in effect to
>DELETE { ?s ?p ?o } WHERE { ?s ?p ?o }
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
