On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Dimitris Spanos <[email protected]>wrote:
> > is where the transformation that I'm considering comes into play. The > nodes of the transformed tree will be mere Op extensions that would > just hold the extra ancestor variable information, nothing fancy that > would make tree processing more convenient. > > Would it not be easier to create a hashmap in the visitor that was indexed by the Op and stored in information you want to put in the transformed tree? That map could then be passed to a later process. -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web<http://like-like.xenei.com> Identity: https://www.identify.nu/[email protected] LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
