In fact, we did change the model of rdf, which is rdf with annotation, so it's not traditional triple.. And therefore, i believe simply modifying rdfs.rules will not work… But anyway, thanks for your help..
On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Chris Dollin wrote: > On Tuesday, July 03, 2012 10:33:57 AM Cong Wang wrote: > > > I am planning to modify the code of rdfs inference in jena, > > actually I need to add some more rules for domain need.. > > Does anyone know which part of the code I need to modify??? > > > > > Do you need to change rdfs inference in Jena, or do you just > need to create a new inference model with different rules? > > Jena's RDFS inference is mostly just some particular rules > supplied to a rule-based reasoner. You can supply your own > rules (based on the default RDFS rules) to do whatever you > want. > > The default rules are in etc. Depending on your requirements, > I think you want to start with rdfs-fb.rules or rdfs.rules -- the fb > set uses hybrid inference (forward rules which can generate > backward rules), while the rdfs.rules can I think run in either > direction since they're not hybrid. > > Chris > > -- > "It is seldom good news." ~Crystal Ball~, /The Tough Guide to Fantasyland/ > > Epimorphics Ltd, http://www.epimorphics.com > Registered address: Court Lodge, 105 High Street, Portishead, Bristol BS20 6PT > Epimorphics Ltd. is a limited company registered in England (number 7016688) > >
