Yes that would be correct, since the query is being executed within Fuseki you need a version of Fuseki (0.2.3) that has ARQ 2.9.2 or higher in order to get the MINUS improvements
The ARQ on the client side is just receiving the results from the SPARQL endpoint Rob On 7/5/12 2:09 PM, "Federico López" <[email protected]> wrote: >Well... Yes.. but I was using ARQ 2.9.2 in the client side and Fuseki >0.2.2 >in the server side. I guess that the Fuseki 0.2.3 comes with a better >version of MINUS. > >2012/7/5 Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> > >> On 05/07/12 21:57, Milorad Tosic wrote: >> >>> Would somebody please give us more details about what are dependencies >>> between Fuseki and Jena/ARQ/TDB? >>> >> >> That would be the POM files :-) >> >> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/**org/apache/jena/jena-fuseki/0.** >> >>2.2/jena-fuseki-0.2.2.pom<http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/jena/j >>ena-fuseki/0.2.2/jena-fuseki-0.2.2.pom> >> >> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/**org/apache/jena/jena-fuseki/0.** >> >>2.3/jena-fuseki-0.2.3.pom<http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/jena/j >>ena-fuseki/0.2.3/jena-fuseki-0.2.3.pom> >> >> >> Fuseki 0.2.2 - ARQ 2.9.1 - Jena 2.7.1 >> Fuseki 0.2.3 - ARQ 2.9.2 - Jena 2.7.2 >> >> Andy >> > > > >-- >*FEDERICO LÓPEZ GÓMEZ* >Estudiante Ingeniería de Sistemas >Universidad del Valle - Sede Tuluá
