On 11/07/12 20:57, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
but it could be the transaction overhead
+1
Not that simple ... another prime candidate is not managing connections
in the same way e.g. connection caching as is managing the dataset with
open/close. These are Fuseki things.
The TDB transaction overhead per se is a few wrapper objects (to enforce
read-only) and in TDB-only tests, has not shown up as significant in a
setup like your as I understand it.
Just to check details: what's the config file for Fuseki that you are
using or these tests?
Andy