You were right, I was picking up an older version from a different bundle .
Problem solved, thanks a lot.
2012/10/25 Rob Vesse <rve...@yarcdata.com>
> Are you sure you are using the latest version of ARQ? What version are
> you using?
>
> For reference current version is the newly released 2.9.4 and current
> snapshot version is 2.9.5-SNAPSHOT
>
> ARQ has supported the values clause for some time and is 100% SPARQL 1.1
> compliant, so either you have the wrong version of ARQ in your class path
> or you are somehow invoking the query parser in SPARQL 1.0 mode instead of
> SPARQL 1.1 mode (SPARQL 1.1 is the default)
>
> You can add the following to your code to print out the version
> information from the ARQ JAR at runtime:
>
> Version jenaVer = new Version();
> jenaVer.addClass(Jena.class);
> jenaVer.addClass(ARQ.class);
> jenaVer.print();
>
> This will allow you to see if you have a mismatch between the version of
> ARQ you think you are using and the version being picked up at runtime.
>
> You can also run Fuseki with the --version option to just print version
> information and exit to confirm that you are using an up to date version
> of Fuseki as well.
>
> Hope this helps?
>
> Rob
>
>
> On 10/25/12 9:10 AM, "Audun Stolpe" <audunsto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi I am experiencing trouble getting ARQ to parse a query with the new
> >VALUES keyword in it. A simple select like
> >
> >SELECT ?area WHERE {
> >
> >?person <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/birthPlace> ?area.
> >VALUES ?person {<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Peder_Christian_Andersen>}
> >
> >}
> >
> >Passed to the QueryExecutionFactory.sparqlService(endpoint, test), where
> >'test' is the above query and 'endpoint' is a local Fuseki instance of the
> >latest build, gives the following error message:
> >
> >Exception in thread "main" com.hp.hpl.jena.query.QueryParseException:
> >Lexical error at line 1, column 88. Encountered: " " (32), after :
> >"VALUES".
> >
> >I'm using the latest snapshot of ARQ, which leads me to believe that
> >VALUES
> >isn't yet implemented? Would anyone want to enlighten me?
> >
> >Best,
> >
> >Audun
>
>
