On 13/11/12 12:26, "Dr. André Lanka" wrote:
Hi Andy,
On 12.11.2012 18:21, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Is each store using named graphs? Or is one store, one graph?
One store is one default graph without any special named graphs along.
The reason for having multiple stores is that we need write access to
each graph in parallel. Serialising the write access would lead to poor
performance for our application. By having multiple stores, we can write
to each store independent of the current state of the other stores. I
assume that this would also be a problem when we use dynamic datasets.
Or is there something I missed again?
No - that's a reasonable setup, in fact one of the few I can think of
for multiple stores each with one graph.
I look forward to the patch,
Andy
Best wishes
André
